Dr. Matthew  Cashmore
My Social Links

Dr. Matthew Cashmore

Associate Professor
Aalborg University, Denmark


Highest Degree
Ph.D. in Environmental Science from University of East Anglia, UK

Share this Profile

Biography

Dr. Matthew Cashmore is currently working as Associate Professor in Environmental Assessment and Governance, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark. He obtained his Ph.D. in Environmental Science from University of East Anglia, UK. He was author and coauthor of more than 26 journal papers, and 10 book/book chapters and journal special issues etc. He was received two year funded research fellowship at the Swedish EIA Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden, and Best paper in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, and Invited to stand for Board of Directors of the International Association for Impact Assessment. He is member of editor board in Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. He is also serving as Peer review for a wide range of ISI journals. He is member of the Board, Danish Development Research Network, Expert Advisory Committee, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agencys Help Desk on Environment and Climate Change.

Area of Interest:

Environmental Sciences
100%
Environmental Impact Assessment
62%
Environmental Management
90%
Sustainability
75%
Environmental Impact Study
55%

Research Publications in Numbers

Books
0
Chapters
0
Articles
0
Abstracts
0

Selected Publications

  1. Rozema, J.G., M. Cashmore, A.J. Bond and J. Chilvers, 2015. Respatialization and local protest strategy formation: Investigating high-speed rail megaproject development in the UK. Geoforum, 59: 98-108.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  2. Cashmore, M., T. Richardson and A. Axelsson, 2014. Seeing power in international development cooperation: Environmental policy integration and the World Bank. Trans. Inst. Br. Geographers, 39: 155-168.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  3. Cashmore, M. and R.K. Morgan, 2014. The impact assessment arms race and visions for the future. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 32: 25-26.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  4. Cashmore, M. and A. Wejs, 2014. Constructing legitimacy for climate change planning: A study of local government in Denmark. Global Environ. Change, 24: 203-212.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  5. Hansen, A.M., L. Kornov, M. Cashmore and T. Richardson, 2013. The significance of structural power in strategic environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 39: 37-45.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  6. Cashmore, M. and T. Richardson, 2013. Power and environmental assessment: Introduction to the special issue. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 39: 1-4.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  7. Cashmore, M. and A. Axelsson, 2013. The mediation of environmental assessment's influence: What role for power? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 39: 5-12.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  8. Rozema, J.G., A.J. Bond, M. Cashmore and J. Chilvers, 2012. An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 33: 80-90.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  9. Cashmore, M., 2012. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. J. Integr. Environ. Sci., 9: 53-54.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  10. Cashmore, M. and L. Kornov, 2012. The Changing Theory of Impact Assessment. In: Sustainability Assessment: Pluralism, Practice and Progress, Bond, A., A. Morrison-Saunders and R. Howitt (Eds.). Chapter 2, Routledge, London, UK., ISBN-13: 9780415598484, pp: 18-33.
  11. Axelsson, A., D. Annandale, M. Cashmore, D. Slunge, A. Ekbom, F. Loayza and R. Verheem, 2012. Policy SEA: Lessons from development co-operation. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 30: 124-129.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  12. Badr, E.S.A., A.A. Zahran and M. Cashmore, 2011. Benchmarking performance: Environmental impact statements in Egypt. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 31: 279-285.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  13. Theophilou, V., A. Bond and M. Cashmore, 2010. Application of the SEA Directive to EU structural funds: Perspectives on effectiveness. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30: 136-144.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  14. Cashmore, M., T. Richardson, T. Hilding-Ryedvik and L. Emmelin, 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: Theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30: 371-379.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  15. Cashmore, M., A. Bond and B. Sadler, 2009. Introduction: The effectiveness of impact assessment instruments. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 27: 91-93.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  16. Cashmore, M., A. Bond and D. Cobb, 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: Theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. J. Environ. Manage., 88: 1233-1248.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  17. Cashmore, M., A. Bond and D. Cobb, 2007. The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: Toward a richer empirical understanding. Environ. Manage., 40: 516-530.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  18. Cashmore, M., 2007. The Contribution of Environmental Assessment to Sustainable Development. In: Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development: European Practice and Experience, George, C. and C. Kirkpatrick (Eds.). Chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publ., Cheltenham, UK., ISBN-13: 9781847205407, pp: 106-130.
  19. Pischke, F. and M. Cashmore, 2006. Decision-oriented environmental assessment: An empirical study of its theory and methods. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26: 643-662.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  20. Tinker, L., D. Cobb, A. Bond and M. Cashmore, 2005. Impact mitigation in environmental impact assessment: Paper promises or the basis of consent conditions? Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 23: 265-280.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  21. Nieslony, C. and M. Cashmore, 2005. The contribution of EIA to sustainable development: Part 1-Stakeholder beliefs on the nature and effectiveness of the relationship. UVP-Rep., 19: 191-194.
    Direct Link  |  
  22. Cashmore, M., A. Bond and T. Nitz, 2005. Theory is important to EA practice. Environmentalist, 32: 18-20.
  23. Cashmore, M., R. Gwilliam, R. Morgan, D. Cobb and A. Bond, 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: Substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 22: 295-310.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  24. Cashmore, M., 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: Process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 24: 403-426.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  25. Brimblecombe, P. and M. Cashmore, 2004. Indoor air pollution. Journal de Physique IV, 117: 209-221.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  26. Badr, E.S.A., M. Cashmore and D. Cobb, 2004. The consideration of impacts upon the aquatic environment in environmental impact statements in England and Wales. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 6: 19-49.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  27. Wang, Y., R.K. Morgan and M. Cashmore, 2003. Environmental impact assessment of projects in the People's Republic of China: New law, old problems. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 23: 543-579.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  28. Cashmore, M., E. Christophilopoulos and D. Cobb, 2002. An evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Thessaloniki, Greece. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 4: 371-395.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
  29. Brimblecombe, P. and M. Cashmore, 2002. Air pollution perceptions and policy. Clean Air Environ. Qual., 36: 31-34.
    Direct Link  |