1. Yazdani, M., D. Pamucar, P. Chatterjee and A.E. Torkayesh, 2022. “A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”. Oper. Manage. Res., 15: 116-145.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
2. Yazdani, M., A.E. Torkayesh, P. Chatterjee, A. Fallahpour, M.J. Montero-Simo, R.A. Araque-Padilla and K.Y. Wong, 2022. A fuzzy group decision-making model to measure resiliency in a food supply chain: A case study in Spain. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., Vol. 82. 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101257.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
3. Kumar, V., K. Kalita, P. Chatterjee, E.K. Zavadskas and S. Chakraborty, 2022. A SWARA-CoCoSo-based approach for spray painting robot selection. Informatica, 33: 35-54.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
4. Gupta, S., S. Chaudhary, P. Chatterjee and M. Yazdani, 2022. An efficient stochastic programming approach for solving integrated multi-objective transportation and inventory management problem using goodness of fit. Kybernetes, 51: 768-803.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
5. Yazdani, M., E.D.R.S. Gonzalez and P. Chatterjee, 2021. A multi-criteria decision-making framework for agriculture supply chain risk management under a circular economy context. Manage. Decis., 59: 1801-1826.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
6. Torkayesh, A.E., D. Pamucar, F. Ecer and P. Chatterjee, 2021. An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., Vol. 78. 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101052.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
7. Gupta, S., P. Chatterjee, M. Yazdani and E.D.R.S. Gonzalez, 2021. A multi-level programming model for green supplier selection. Manag. Decis, 59: 2496-2527.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
8. Yazdani, M., P. Chatterjee, E.K. Zavadskas and S.H. Zolfani, 2017. Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J. Cleaner Prod., 142: 3728-3740.
9. Ranjan, R., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2016. Performance evaluation of Indian states in tourism using an integrated PROMETHEE-GAIA approach. OPSEARCH, 53: 63-84.
   CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
10. Ranjan, R., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2016. Performance evaluation of Indian railway zones using DEMATEL and VIKOR methods. Benchmarking Int. J., 23: 78-95.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
11. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2016. A comparative analysis of VIKOR method and its variants. Decis. Sci. Lett., 5: 469-486.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
12. Ranjan, R., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2015. Performance evaluation of Indian railway zones using DEMATEL and VIKOR methods. Benchmark.: Int. J., Vol. 23. .
    Direct Link  |  
13. Ranjan, R., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2015. Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods. Opsearch, 52: 307-328.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
14. Chatterjee, P., S. Mondal and S. Chakraborty, 2014. A comprehensive solution to automated inspection device selection problems using Electre methods. Int. J. Technol., 5: 193-208.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
15. Chatterjee, P., S. Mondal and S. Chakraborty, 2014. A comparative study of preference dominance-based approaches for selection of industrial robots. Adv. Product. Eng. Manage., 9: 5-20.
    Direct Link  |  
16. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2014. Investigating the effect of normalization norms in flexible manufacturing sytem selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., 7: 141-150.
    Direct Link  |  
17. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2014. Flexible manufacturing system selection using preference ranking methods: A comparative study. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput., 5: 315-338.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
18. Rai, D., G.K. Jha, P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2013. Material selection in manufacturing environment using compromise ranking and regret theory-based compromise ranking methods: A comparative study. Univer. J. Mater. Sci., 1: 69-77.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
19. Jha, G.K., P. Chatterjee, R. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2013. Suppliers selection in manufacturing environment using range of value method. J. Mech. Eng., 3: 15-22.
    Direct Link  |  
20. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2013. Nontraditional machining processes selection using evaluation of mixed data method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 68: 1613-1626.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
21. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2013. Gear material selection using complex proportional assessment and additive ratio assessment-based approaches: A comparative study. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1: 104-111.
    Direct Link  |  
22. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2013. Advanced manufacturing systems selection using ORESTE method. Int. J. Adv. Operat. Manage., 5: 337-361.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
23. Chakraborty, S. and P. Chatterjee, 2013. Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data. Decis. Sci. Lett., 2: 135-148.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
24. Maity, S.R., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2012. Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method. Mater. Design, 36: 372-378.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
25. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2012. Materials selection using COPRAS and COPRAS-G methods. Int. J. Mater. Struct. Integrity Mater. Select., 6: 111-133.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
26. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2012. Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Mater. Design, 35: 384-393.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
27. Athawale, V.M., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2012. Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking method. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., 11: 3-15.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
28. Athawale, V.M., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2012. Decision making for facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., 11: 16-30.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
29. Chatterjee, P., V.M Athawale and S. Chakraborty, 2011. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater. Design, 32: 851-860.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
30. Chatterjee, P., P. Mukherjee and S. Chakraborty, 2011. Supplier selection using compromise ranking and outranking methods. J. Ind. Eng. Int., 7: 61-73.
    Direct Link  |  
31. Chatterjee, P., V.M. Athawale and S. Chakraborty, 2010. Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 26: 483-489.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
32. Chatterjee, P., V.M. Athawale and S. Chakraborty, 2010. Selection of facility layouts using ELECTRE II method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Syst., 1: 41-53.
33. Chatterjee, P. and S. Chakraborty, 2010. Selection of flexible manufacturing systems using complex proportional assessment method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Syst., 1: 183-190.
34. Athawale, V.M., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2010. Supplier selection using PROMETHEE II method. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Ind. Eng., 1: 95-102.
35. Chatterjee, P., V.M. Athawale and S. Chakraborty, 2009. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater. Design, 30: 4043-4053.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  
36. Athawale, V.M., P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, 2009. Materials selection using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Manuf. Technol. Today, 8: 9-18.